Here is a curated list of period and near-period maps (1860–1865) that depict the Confederate States of America as a country or distinct political entity. I’ve grouped them by type (contemporary, wartime, and immediate postwar reconstructions often used in scholarship), with notes useful for historical or cartographic analysis.

---

I. Contemporary / Wartime Maps (1860–1865)

1. Harper’s Weekly Confederate Map (February 23, 1861)

• One of the earliest printed maps showing the Confederacy as a separate nation
• Published just after initial secessions
• Depicts a divided United States, often including border states (Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland) as Southern-aligned

Cartographic significance:

• Reflects uncertainty and propaganda framing rather than strict political reality
• Demonstrates early Northern perceptions of a “Southern nation”

---

2. “Map Showing the Comparative Area of the Northern and Southern States” (1861)

• Closely related to the Harper’s Weekly map tradition
• Emphasizes scale comparison between Union and Confederacy
• Often used as visual rhetoric in newspapers

---

3. Lloyd’s Map of the Southern States (1861)

• Full title: Lloyd’s Map of the Southern States Showing All the Railroads
• One of the most detailed commercial maps of the Confederacy
• Shows:
  • Railroads
  • Cities
  • Strategic infrastructure

Importance:

• Widely used by military planners and civilians
• Treats the Confederacy as a functional geographic unit

---

4. Lloyd’s Railroad Map of the Southern States (1862)

• Updated wartime edition
• Adds distance tables and logistics data
• Highlights the Confederacy’s transportation network weakness

---

5. “Map of the Confederate States of America” (Richmond / various publishers, c. 1861–1863)

• Multiple editions exist
• Typically show:
  • 11 seceded states
  • Sometimes claimed states (Missouri, Kentucky)

---

6. Confederate Electoral Map (1861)

• Shows electoral distribution under the Confederate Constitution
• Strong evidence of the Confederacy being treated as a sovereign political system

---

7. Military Department Maps (1861–1862)

From state archives (e.g., Texas collections):

• “Map of the United States Showing Union and Confederate Geographical Divisions” (1860–1862 series)

These maps:

• Divide territory into Confederate departments
• Reinforce a state-like administrative geography

---

8. Secession Maps (1860–1861)

• Show chronological secession:
  • South Carolina → Deep South → Upper South
• Often used in atlases and newspapers

Example themes:

• “The United States Secession, 1860–1861”
• “United States at the Outbreak of the Civil War”

These maps explicitly identify the Confederacy as a new political entity forming over time

---

II. Synthetic / Composite Period Maps (Based on 1861–1865 Data)

9. Territorial Evolution Maps (1861–1865)

• Show expansion and claims over time
• Include:
  • Admission of states (Feb 1861)
  • Claims to Kentucky & Missouri

Example:

Usefulness:

• Ideal for historians because they:
  • Distinguish between claimed vs. controlled territory
  • Show temporal development of the Confederacy
• Reflects the formation beginning February 1861

---

10. OmniAtlas Civil War Political Maps (1861 snapshots)

• Provide dated snapshots (e.g., March 1861, April 1862)
• Emphasize:
  • Confederate vs Union boundaries
  • Territorial claims vs reality

---

III. Late 19th / Early 20th Century Maps Using Period Data

(Not strictly produced during the war, but widely used in scholarship and often mistaken for period maps.)

11. “History of the Civil War in the United States, 1860–1865” (1897)

• A time-scaled historical map/chart
• Shows events across space and time rather than static geography

---

12. Fitzhugh Lee Confederate Map (c. 1910, based on wartime understanding)

• Titled: Map of the Confederate States of America
• Includes:
  • Leaders
  • Battles
  • National symbolism

Interpretation:

• Represents postwar Confederate memory and identity, not just geography

---

IV. Key Cartographic Themes Across These Maps

1. Ambiguous Borders

• Kentucky and Missouri frequently appear:
  • Fully Confederate
  • Split
  • Or excluded

This reflects political claims vs military control

---

2. Nation vs Rebellion Framing

Maps differ depending on origin:

• Confederate / Southern sources:
  • Portray CSA as a sovereign nation
• Union / Northern sources:
  • Sometimes depict it as “insurrectionary states”

---

3. Infrastructure Emphasis

Many maps (especially Lloyd’s):

• Highlight:
  • Railroads
  • Rivers
  • Ports

This underscores the Confederacy as a functional geopolitical system, not just ideology

---

4. Temporal Fluidity

Unlike stable nation-state maps:

• CSA maps change rapidly (1861–1862 especially)
• Reflect:
  • Secession waves
  • Military occupation
  • Administrative reorganization

---

V. Where to Find High-Quality Originals

For your work (especially cartographic research), the best repositories are:

• Library of Congress (Civil War map collection)
• Wikimedia Commons (CSA map category)
• David Rumsey Map Collection
• State archives (Texas, Virginia, Georgia)

Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. The Cartographic Institute earns a small commission on qualifying purchases as an Amazon Associate at no additional cost to you.

VI. Representative List (Quick Reference)

Core “Confederacy as a Country” Maps (1860–1865):

1. Harper’s Weekly Confederate Map (1861)
2. Comparative North vs South Map (1861)
3. Lloyd’s Map of the Southern States (1861)
4. Lloyd’s Railroad Map (1862)
5. Richmond-published CSA maps (1861–1863)
6. Confederate Electoral Map (1861)
7. Military Department Maps (1860–1862 series)
8. Secession progression maps (1860–1861)
9. Territorial evolution maps (1861–1865)
10. OmniAtlas dated Civil War maps (1861 snapshots)